Discussion about this post

User's avatar
GM's avatar

You'll probably get into this in part 2, but... (and maybe I'm using substack wrong but I assume its for discourse) ----

I wonder about the ontology and aim of public education purported in the context of this definition of "success" (I'm reading it as academic, maybe aligned with a prosperity consciousness)? How might "success" be expanded when describing a public school within the landscape of a city that contains many disenfranchised and oppressed populations? I'd love to see some data about barriers to entry in Bronx Science and average house-hold income and demographics compared to other public schools. (Median house-hold income in NYC in 2019 was $63,799 according to U.S. Census Bureau).

"Success" within a macro-analysis of NYC's public-school system might look like students receiving an education that facilitates the attainment of social capital, cultural capital, healthy relationships, mentorships, enhanced sense of agency, expanded spheres of belonging, and improved health amidst lacking economic capital and other challenges. Some of these elements of success might fall outside of a conventional use of the word. I am sure that many students at Bronx Science represent under-resourced demographics. I am curious what percentage of the student body and how these students fair within a school ecosystem that features more privileged students? What resources are allotted to them? What efforts are schools like Bronx Science and Laguardia doing to broaden their student body? How is primary school 'choice' factoring into which students have the opportunity to attend specialized high schools? (maybe research has already been done on this)

I think it's quite interesting that some of these findings about what facilitates "success" are not curricular or directly in the control of public policy. Alumni funding indicates a historied siphoning of resources that greatly serves some folks, but doesn't offer a blue print to translate to other public schools that don't boast the same "success," other than increased public funding/resources. Some of these findings seem transferrable - the healthy/enriching consequences offered by extra-curricular programming, and the excitement for learning that is embedded in the culture due to like-minded peers. These things can be achieved through subcultural human-centric movements within a school even without huge financing changes.

Expand full comment
Daniel Golliher's avatar

For bonus background: on January 25, 2023, the City Council education committee held a hearing about the city's public school admissions process (among other things). The committee report is a pretty good primer for people looking to get up to speed with how things work, what's changing now, what's being considered, etc.

Anyone can find the committee report (the City Council staff's brief for council members about a hearing subject matter), the transcript, and public testimony via Legistar, and this particular hearing's docs are here: https://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5986179&GUID=350EEE56-40D7-4BC1-B742-78B5D429B437&Options=&Search=

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts